Business Contract Drafting, Vetting, and Negotiation | Unimarks Legal Solutions

A contract that looks complete but is missing one enforceable clause is not a contract but a liability. Most business disputes in India do not arise from bad intentions. They arise from agreements that were drafted without understanding what Indian law requires to make a clause stick.

What We Do

We draft agreements from instructions — not from templates. Every agreement we produce is tailored to the specific transaction, the specific parties, the specific regulatory environment, and the specific risk allocation the client needs. We begin by understanding the commercial objective of the agreement, then structure the legal terms to achieve that objective while protecting the client's position.

Who We Do It For

Businesses and Entrepreneurs.Corporations and Investors.Franchise businesses, Partnerships, Startups. We review agreements presented by the counterparty, identifying unfavourable terms, missing protections, ambiguous language that creates dispute risk, and clauses that may be unenforceable under Indian law

What We Deliver

We advise on negotiation strategy and attend negotiations where our presence adds value. Our role is to ensure that the terms agreed in negotiations are accurately reflected in the final document, a gap that frequently creates disputes when the term sheet or heads of terms are loosely drafted and the formal agreement is negotiated without legal oversight.

Comprehensive Business Agreement Services

At Unimarks Legal Solutions, we draft, vet, and negotiate commercial agreements for businesses, startups, founders, investors, franchisors, employers, and technology companies across India. Every agreement we produce is built on the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and the foundational statute that determines whether your contract is enforceable, whether a penalty clause will hold, and whether a court will grant you specific performance or only damages when the other party defaults.

We have drafted and reviewed agreements across M&A transactions, franchise structures, technology licensing, employment relationships, joint ventures, vendor arrangements, e-commerce platforms, and real estate transactions for clients ranging from first-time founders to mid-market enterprises and multinational entities entering the Indian market.

Get Your Contract Drafted or Reviewed — Free Consultation” → /contact-us/

Which Agreement Do You Need? Start Here.

Your SituationAgreement TypeKey Legal Framework
Co-founders starting a business togetherFounders’ Agreement / Shareholders’ AgreementIndian Contract Act, Companies Act 2013
Hiring an employee or senior executiveEmployment Agreement / Service ContractIndian Contract Act, ID Act, Shops Act
Engaging a freelancer or consultantIndependent Contractor / Consultancy AgreementIndian Contract Act, TDS implications
Sharing confidential information before a dealNon-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)Indian Contract Act, Section 27 (non-compete limits)
Selling your product or service to a businessSales Agreement / Service AgreementIndian Contract Act, MSMED Act (if MSME buyer/seller)
Distributing your product through a third partyDistribution / Dealership AgreementIndian Contract Act, Competition Act 2002
Licensing your brand, technology, or IPIP Licensing / Technology Transfer AgreementCopyright Act, Patents Act, Trade Marks Act
Expanding via franchiseFranchise AgreementIndian Contract Act, Consumer Protection Act
Raising funding from investorsTerm Sheet / SHA / Convertible NoteCompanies Act 2013, FEMA, SEBI regulations
Acquiring or merging with another businessSPA / APA / M&A AgreementCompanies Act 2013, Competition Act, SEBI
Collaborating with another businessJoint Venture / Strategic Alliance AgreementIndian Contract Act, Companies Act 2013
Leasing commercial premisesCommercial Lease AgreementTransfer of Property Act, Registration Act, Stamp Act
Protecting your website or app usersTerms of Service / Privacy PolicyIT Act 2000, DPDP Act 2023, Consumer Protection Act

The stamp duty question every business owner overlooks: Under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and respective State Stamp Acts, agreements relating to property, shares, and certain commercial transactions must be stamped at the prescribed rate before execution. An unstamped or inadequately stamped instrument is inadmissible as evidence in Indian courts — regardless of how well the contract is drafted. We advise on stamp duty implications before every agreement is finalised.

Discuss Your Agreement – Free Legal Consultation” → /contact-us/]

Our Agreement Practice Areas

                                                                          Credentials

CredentialDetail
IP matters handled25,000+ trademarks, 200+ patents — commercial agreements underpin every IP transaction
Startups and businesses advised5,000+
Years of commercial practice15+
Transaction typesM&A, startup investment, franchise, technology licensing, employment, e-commerce, real estate
Litigation backgroundCommercial Courts, Madras HC, Arbitration — our drafting is shaped by how disputes actually arise
OfficesChennai · Cochin · Hyderabad

The litigation advantage in drafting: Our commercial litigation practice gives us direct visibility into how poorly drafted agreements are argued in court. We draft agreements knowing what an opposing counsel will challenge, what a judge will ask for, and what a court will enforce. That perspective from practitioners who have been on both sides of contract disputes shapes every clause we produce.

Have Your Contract Drafted or Reviewed – Free Consultation” → /contact-us/

Business Contracts and Agreements FAQ's

Under Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a contract is enforceable if it is made by the free consent of parties who are competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object, and is not expressly declared void. Free consent means consent not vitiated by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake (Sections 13–22). Competence means parties who are of legal age (18+), of sound mind, and not disqualified by any law. Lawful consideration means the parties are exchanging something of value that is not prohibited by law. An agreement that fails any of these requirements is either void or voidable.

Oral contracts are generally valid and enforceable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 — there is no general requirement that contracts be in writing. However, certain contracts must be in writing and registered to be valid or enforceable: contracts for immovable property above ₹100 (Registration Act, 1908), deeds of mortgage, gifts of immovable property, and certain commercial agreements specified by state legislation. Even where writing is not mandatory, a written agreement is always preferable it eliminates disputes about what was agreed, provides documentary evidence in court, and prevents misunderstandings that arise from the natural unreliability of memory.

Non-compete clauses that operate during the employment relationship preventing an employee from working for a competitor while employed are generally enforceable in India as reasonable restrictions. Non-compete clauses that operate after the employment relationship ends are void under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, which prohibits agreements in restraint of trade. Indian courts have consistently held that post-employment non-compete clauses are unenforceable regardless of how they are drafted, because they deprive the individual of their right to earn a livelihood. What remains enforceable post-employment: non-solicitation of clients and employees (for a reasonable period and geographic scope), and NDAs protecting confidential information. Agreements that are enforceable in the US or UK may be entirely void in India always review non-compete provisions under Indian law before relying on them.

Under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and the applicable State Stamp Acts, certain commercial instruments must be stamped at the prescribed rate before or at execution. An unstamped or inadequately stamped instrument is inadmissible as evidence in a court of law meaning you cannot use it to enforce your rights in litigation, regardless of how well it is drafted. Stamp duty rates vary by agreement type and by state Maharashtra, Karnataka, Delhi, and Tamil Nadu each have their own stamp schedules. Common agreements attracting stamp duty include: share subscription agreements, mortgage agreements, lease deeds, partnership deeds, and loan agreements. Before executing any significant commercial agreement, confirm the applicable stamp duty and pay it correctly.

Under Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (as amended in 2018), specific performance of a contract is enforceable as a matter of course — not merely at the court’s discretion. This 2018 amendment significantly strengthened the position of commercial parties who want actual performance (delivery of the property, completion of the project, transfer of the shares) rather than just monetary compensation. Specific performance is not available for contracts of personal service (you cannot compel someone to perform employment obligations), for contracts where monetary compensation is adequate, or where the contract itself is void under the Indian Contract Act.

An enforceable NDA under Indian law should clearly define: (a) what constitutes confidential information specific enough to avoid disputes about what is covered; (b) the obligations of the receiving party what they can and cannot do with the information; (c) permitted disclosures when disclosure to employees, advisors, or regulators is permitted; (d) the duration of confidentiality obligations both during the agreement and post-termination; (e) exclusions from confidentiality — information that is already public, independently developed, or received from a third party without restriction; (f) the remedy for breach injunctive relief under Section 37 of the Specific Relief Act is the most important remedy, because damages may be difficult to quantify; and (g) the governing law and jurisdiction for dispute resolution. Non-compete provisions embedded in NDAs must comply with Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act.

A shareholders’ agreement (SHA) for an Indian company typically addresses: equity ownership and vesting schedules (founder equity subject to reverse vesting is standard for investor-backed startups); governance and board composition (founder vs investor board seats, reserved matters requiring investor approval); investor rights (information rights, pro-rata rights in future rounds, anti-dilution protection either broad-based weighted average or full ratchet); transfer restrictions (right of first refusal, right of first offer, drag-along and tag-along rights); exit provisions (IPO, strategic sale, put options after a specified period); and dispute resolution (typically arbitration for institutional investors). For companies receiving foreign investment, the SHA must comply with FEMA pricing guidelines — shares cannot be issued to non-residents below the fair market value determined by a SEBI-registered valuer.

In an Asset Purchase Agreement (APA), the buyer acquires specific assets of the target business plant, equipment, inventory, IP, customer contracts, goodwill without acquiring the legal entity itself. Liabilities not expressly assumed stay with the seller. APAs are used when the buyer wants asset-level protection from the target’s historical liabilities. In a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA), the buyer acquires the shares of the company taking the entire legal entity with all its assets and liabilities, known and unknown. SPAs require thorough due diligence and comprehensive representations and warranties (with indemnification for undisclosed liabilities). The tax treatment differs significantly: in an APA, stamp duty is payable on the transfer of individual assets at varying rates; in an SPA, stamp duty is payable on the transfer of shares, generally at a lower rate. Competition Act filings with the Competition Commission of India are required for transactions above the prescribed thresholds regardless of APA or SPA structure.

Yes. Arbitration clauses in commercial contracts are enforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. A valid arbitration clause must specify: the number of arbitrators, the seat of arbitration (which determines the supervisory court at seat in Chennai, meaning Madras High Court supervises), the applicable rules (ad hoc under the Act, or institutional under SIAC, DIAC, LCIA India, or MCIA rules), and the governing law. Courts in India are now significantly more arbitration-friendly than in earlier decades, the 2015 and 2019 amendments to the Arbitration Act have accelerated the enforcement process and limited court interference. For international commercial contracts with a foreign party, an arbitration clause with a neutral seat (Singapore is common) provides neutrality and the benefit of the New York Convention for the enforcement of the award.

Since India has no dedicated franchise legislation, the franchise agreement is the entire legal basis of the franchise relationship. Critical franchisor protection clauses include: IP licence (clearly defined, revocable on breach, returning all branded materials on termination); quality control obligations on the franchisee with audit and inspection rights; territory definition and exclusivity (or non-exclusivity) with performance obligations; termination triggers (breach, insolvency, failure to meet standards, non-payment of fees) with notice periods and cure periods; post-termination restrictions (non-compete for a reasonable period within the territory); dispute resolution (arbitration for commercial confidentiality); and clear fee structure (franchise fee, royalty, marketing fund contributions). Without a non-compete restriction post-termination, the former franchisee can immediately compete using the knowledge and goodwill built during the franchise a common and costly oversight.

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 requires data fiduciaries (entities that collect and process personal data of Indian residents) to: obtain clear and informed consent from data principals before processing their personal data; provide a privacy notice specifying the purpose of processing; appoint a Data Protection Officer if required; implement reasonable security safeguards; and comply with data principal rights — including the right to access information, the right to correction, the right to erasure, and the right to nominate a person to exercise these rights in the event of death or incapacity. A DPDP Act-compliant privacy policy must address all of these elements in plain language. Earlier privacy policies drafted under the IT Act, 2000 rules are not automatically DPDP compliant — they require review and update before the Act’s provisions are enforced.

Under the Limitation Act, 1963, the limitation period for a suit for breach of contract is three years from the date the breach occurred, or from the date the right to sue first accrued. For recovery of money under a contract (debt recovery), the limitation period is also three years. For claims under a guarantee, time runs from the date of demand and refusal. Once the limitation period expires, the remedy is barred not the right, but the ability to enforce it through court proceedings. This is why acting promptly on contract breaches is essential. Limitation periods can sometimes be extended by acknowledgement of liability in writing (Section 18 of the Limitation Act) a fact that is relevant both for drafting correspondence after a breach and for defending against stale claims.

 

An indemnification clause requires one party (the indemnifier) to compensate the other party (the inddemnitee) for losses arising from specified events  typically breaches of representations and warranties, third-party claims arising from the indemnifier’s actions, or specific identified risks. Key drafting elements: the scope of losses covered (direct losses only, or also indirect losses, consequential losses, loss of profits?); the cap on total indemnification liability (typically a multiple of the contract value unlimited indemnity is rarely commercially justifiable); survival period (how long after the agreement terminates can indemnification claims be made?); notice and cooperation obligations; and the relationship between indemnification and other remedies. Under Indian law, unlimited penalty clauses may be subject to judicial review under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act courts can reduce penalties to the actual damage proved. Indemnification clauses should be drafted with this in mind.

Under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, buyers who purchase goods or services from MSME suppliers are required to make payment within 45 days of acceptance of goods or services. If payment is not made within 45 days, the buyer is liable to pay compound interest at three times the RBI bank rate on the outstanding amount from the date payment was due. This obligation applies regardless of what the supply agreement says — even if the agreement specifies 90-day or 120-day payment terms, those terms are overridden by the MSMED Act for MSME suppliers. Buyers dealing with MSME vendors should factor this into their payment structures. MSME suppliers who are not paid within 45 days can file a complaint through the MSME Samadhaan portal for expedited recovery.

In a free 30-minute consultation, we review: the nature and purpose of the agreement you need; the key commercial terms that need to be captured; any specific risk areas or counterparty concerns relevant to your transaction; the stamp duty and registration implications; whether arbitration or court jurisdiction is appropriate for your dispute resolution clause; and a realistic estimate of drafting time and professional fees. For agreement review requests, we assess the document you send us before the call and come prepared with the key issues identified. You leave with a specific action plan whether that is a drafting brief, a list of negotiation priorities, or an immediate fix to a critical clause in an existing agreement.

About the Author

Advocate Suresh Kumar has a law practice specialising in Intellectual Property Rights, Commercial legal advisory, debt recovery, commercial litigation, and dispute resolution for domestic and international clients. He is enrolled with the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry and represents clients before all courts and forums in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. This article reflects his understanding of the current legal position and is intended solely for informational purposes.


Disclaimer

This article is published by Unimarks Legal for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or to create an attorney-client relationship. The contents are based on Indian law as applicable at the time of writing and are subject to change. Readers should not act upon the information in this article without seeking independent legal counsel. Every legal situation is unique, and the application of law depends on specific facts and circumstances. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. This publication is made in compliance with the Bar Council of India Rules, which prohibit advertising or solicitation by advocates. Any information received through this article should not be construed as legal advice.

For specific legal guidance on your matter, you may consult a qualified advocate in your jurisdiction.

Feel Free to Contact Us

Please select a valid form